in partnership with

Harvey and Hudson, shirtmakers and tie specialists

GoinGreen - Driving Down Pollution

I Love G-Wiz

CoolTribe - Green Social Networking



Shopping Basket:

You currently have 0 item(s)

Total: £0.00

Subscribe to our newsletter
blog

BP should give substance and meaning to "Beyond Petroleum"

Yesterday Tony Hayward announced that he is stepping down and Bob Dudley will be the new CEO from October. It's a perfect moment to reinvent BP and invest in renewables and "Beyond Petroleum", the initiative started by Lord Browne.

Bob Dudley has some background experience in solar and wind, so the appointment could be promising.  

latest news
DECC lays out six possible futures for low-carbon energy

BusinessGreen, 28 Jul 2010

2050 Pathways Analysis illustrates energy supply and demand trade-offs required over next 40 years.

Efficiency key to 80% carbon reduction

Inside Housing, 28 Jul 2010

The coalition government has promised to improve the energy efficiency of homes as part of plans to reduce emissions by 80 per cent by 2050.
U.K. Carbon Calculator Shows 80% Emissions Reduction Is Achievable By 2050

Bloomberg, 28 Jul 2010

The U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change announced a “carbon calculator” that shows the country’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent in the six decades through 2050 is achievable.
CFTC Approves Green Exchange Application For Designation As A Contract Market

MondoVisione, 26 Jul 2010

Green Exchange LLC (Green Exchange) announced today that its application for designation as a contract market (DCM) has been approved by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Green Exchange filed its DCM application on April 26, 2010.
Company carbon footprint

The three main aspects of a business’s carbon footprint are: energy consumption, transport and use of goods and services.

Energy consumption includes electricity and heating at the company’s offices and it may also entail energy consumption elsewhere.

As to transport, there is a carbon footprint from commuting and business travel, and in addition the transport of goods to customers. For businesses selling physical goods transport can be the bulk of the carbon footprint.

The use of goods and services from other companies contributes to a company’s carbon footprint. However, this invites the question: who is responsible for the carbon footprint in a commercial transaction, the company providing the service or the company receiving it?

For example, a manufacturer produces goods and sells them to a retailer. The retailer in turn sells them to end consumer. How do we apportion the carbon footprint of the process? At each stage a carbon footprint has been created.

If we take the view that the consumer is responsible then the provider has no carbon footprint. It’s the principle of “selling on” the carbon footprint. On the other hand if the provider is responsible, then the consumer has no carbon footprint. This second approach is more likely to be consistently applied because not all consumers will offset. If we adopt the principle that the consumer expects the goods to be “zero footprint” at the point of sale then offsetting will be more universal.

The answer is not set in stone. The reasonable approach is that we all participate is generating the carbon footprint of the process. There is then a potential for double-counting: both the provider and consumer may offset for the same carbon footprint. To avoid this, the provider should declare if the product has been offset or not.

Double-counting can add to cost but it is certainly doubly beneficial to the environment. It is a form of super-offsetting. By offsetting the same emissions twice, instead of bringing the emissions balance to zero we actually capture carbon from the atmosphere.